Disadvantages and advantages of global language
Disadvantages of english language in points
Firstly, it would mean that all other languages would eventually disappear and, along with them, their cultures. These issues will be solved if there is only one language. The non-English speakers, due to this complex, consider themselves inferior infront of those who speak English fluently. According to the SW principle, you see this in the English language, however miniscule or imperceptible it may seem. The resulting different perspectives can determine if the workers in a particular organization function effectively or not, and whether business meetings will bear fruit. Language is a part of every culture. Plus, internet is like my eternally-curvacious daily fuckbuddy, and I don't want it to change ;p oh, and esperanto is not as 'simple' as its proponents make out to be, so that's like a dead language. Overall the essay is good. And there isn't a "you all" form either. The global business world today is becoming increasingly demanding and intense.
You can use it nationally and internationally, worldwide wherever you go without encountering problem. It's not even mccain vs.
Disadvantages of english language wikipedia
This will create a room of discrimination of the minor groups in the society and further enhance it because language in most cases is used as an identity. A native language like English also is disadvantageous because it has limited words to expressing feelings and emotions unlike a mother-tongue language that mostly has a bank of vocabulary. A conclusion never presents additional discussion points and reasons. In conclusion, while there are plus points to having one global language, too much would be lost as a result. People who study languages could translate. Please take note of how my version is more aligned with the original prompt statement when compared to yours. The global business world today is becoming increasingly demanding and intense.
These differences create a troublesome gap that carries with it negative implications and effects on global organizations worldwide. This is seen to create more confusion than understanding that a global language should be.
To what extent do you agree or disagree? Plus, internet is like my eternally-curvacious daily fuckbuddy, and I don't want it to change ;p oh, and esperanto is not as 'simple' as its proponents make out to be, so that's like a dead language.
And although I have huge problems with American nationalism and general fuckedupness of today's AMerica, it is still far more open-minded and individual-centric than most of teh rest of the world.
Therefore, one must be cautious and confirm with the listeners that the message is clear, and try to minimize the effort they must invest in understanding it. Secondly, it would result in the collapse of tourism because there would be no reason to travel for pleasure and interest if all countries had the same language and similar cultures.
Though Chinese has more native speakers, it has some implistic grammar, lacks articles, prepositions and tense.
Therefore, the effective transfer of a message should be free of these shortcuts, with the responsibility for that resting with the speaker, who faces a difficult task.
based on 44 review